01 / HUMAN RIGHTSWho decides, and who can challenge a decision?
A refusal, a ranking or a recommendation can affect a person. The project invites us to examine the reasons behind a decision, the actors responsible and the available remedies.
For discussion: which decisions should retain human involvement?
Autonomy · Transparency · Accountability
02 / WORK AND SERVICESWhat must we preserve as tasks change?
Automation raises questions about training, access to services and how value is shared. An organisation should examine what its tools change for workers and service users.
For discussion: how can we measure progress beyond time saved?
Fairness · Ethical use
03 / SCIENCE AND HEALTHHow should we assess a promise?
A research lead, an experimental result and an available treatment represent different stages. The book proposes examining evidence, limitations and beneficiaries before drawing broader conclusions from a success.
For discussion: who will have access to the benefits of a discovery?
Security · Fairness · Continuous improvement
04 / DATA AND POWERWhat do we reveal, and to whom?
Interactions with digital tools raise questions about data collection, secondary uses and dependence on providers. Trust requires an understanding of a service’s terms.
For discussion: what information can we choose not to share?
Privacy · Transparency · Accountability
05 / CREATIVITY AND IMAGINATIONWhat can stories about machines teach us?
Asimov, Her and stories about robots explore conflicts between obedience, attachment and autonomy. Fiction enriches reflection; it must remain distinct from demonstrated capabilities.
For discussion: why do we sometimes attribute intent to a machine?
Ethical use · Autonomy
06 / THE BOUNDARIES OF PROTECTIONWhat criteria could justify protecting a non-human intelligence?
This philosophical question is approached conditionally. A convincing conversation is not enough to establish subjective experience. The project invites us to examine the criteria, objections and consequences of possible recognition.
For discussion: what evidence should we require before deciding?
Dignity · Accountability · Cooperation